Revisión bibliográfica de la técnica de fenol y sus modificaciones
Barra lateral de artigos
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
A matricectomia química por fenolização é provavelmente a técnica mais utilizada na resolução cirúrgica da onicocriptose. Apesar de ser uma técnica podiátrica por excelência e do vasto conhecimento empírico existente quanto ao seu uso, alguns gestos cirúrgicos realizados em sua execução bem como os diferentes protocolos de cura continuam sendo objeto de debate e controvérsia entre os diferentes autores. e a evidência científica ainda é limitada apesar da popularidade da técnica. No presente artigo realizamos uma revisão bibliográfica atualizada dos artigos mais relevantes para defender diferentes modificações e com base no mesmo propomos algumas idéias que podem ser utilizadas no desenho de estudos prospectivos científicos que contribuam para ampliar o campo de conhecimento de podologia e o nível de evidência científica de um dos tratamentos mais específicos e populares em nossa profissão.
Detalhes do artigo
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Direitos Autorais | Atribuição CC - BY
Esta licença permite que outros distribuam, remixem, adaptem e criem a partir do seu trabalho, mesmo para fins comerciais, desde que lhe atribuam o devido crédito pela criação original. É a licença mais flexível de todas as licenças disponíveis. É recomendada para maximizar a disseminação e uso dos materiais licenciados. Particularmente com relação à licença CC-BY, é preciso destacar que, por ser o tipo de licença mais aberta tanto com relação às permissões e acessos, também é a licença que permite o uso dos conteúdos para fins comerciais. Isso significa que terceiros podem obter lucros com o trabalho alheio a qualquer momento, sem que o criador tenha qualquer controle. Ver o Resumo da Licença | Ver o Texto Legal
Referências
Eekhof JAH, Van Wijk B, Knuistingh Neven A, van der Wouden JC Interventions for ingrowing toenails. En: La Biblioteca Cochrane Plus, 2012, Issue 4. Oxford: Update Software Ltd. Disponible en: http://www.updatedsoftware.com. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Espensen EH, Nixon BP, Armstrong DG. Chemical matrixectomy for ingrown toenails. Is there an evidence basis to guide therapy?. JAPMA, 2002; 92 (5): 287-295.
Dagnall JC. A description of toenail matrix phenolisation 44 years before.
Boll’s 1945 papel. The Foot, 1991; 1: 51-55.
Porter FJW. The treatment of some affections common in military practice. Br Med J, 1901; 1: 476-477.
Heifetz CJ. Ingrown toenail, a clinical study. Am J Surg, 1937; 38: 298- 315.
Boll OF. Surgical correction on ingrown toenails. J Natl Assoc Chiropodist, 1945; 35: 8-9 (July).
Gottlieb MM, Gottlieb JJ. The permanent removal of nails by evulsion and chemical cauterization. Curr Chiropody, 1953; August: 17.
Nyman SP. The phenol-alcohol technique for toenail excision. JNJ Chiropodist Soc, 1956; April: 5.
Suppan RJ, Ritchlin JD. A non-debiliting surgical procedure for ingrown toenail. JAPA, 1962; 900: 52.
Boberg JS, Frederiksen MS, Harton FM. Scientific analysis of phenol nail surgery. JAPMA, 2002; 92 (10): 575-579.
Cooper Jr CT. Phenol-alcohol nail procedure: postoperative care. A comparative study. JAPMA, 1965: 55 (6): 661-663.
Yale JF. Phenol-alcohol technique for correction of infected ingrown toenail. JAPA, 1974; 64: 46.
Dagnall JC. The history, development and current status of nail matrix phenolisation. Chiropodist, 1981; 36: 315-324.
Burzotta JL, Turri RM, Tsouris J. Phenol and alcohol chemical matrixectomy. Clin Podiatr Med Surg, 1989; 6 (2): 453-467.
Butterworth R. Nail surgery en Banks A, editor. McGlamry,´s comprehensive textbook of foot and ankle surgery. 3ª ed. Philadelphia: Lippincot Williams & Wilkins; 2001.
Andreassi A, Grimaldi L, D’Aniello C et al. Segmental phenolization for the treatment of ingrowing toenails: a review of 6 years experience. J Dermatol Treat, 2004; 15: 179-181.
Tatlican S, Yamangoktürk C, Eren F et al. Comparison of phenol applications of different durations for the cauterization of the germinal.matrix: an efficacy and safety study. Acta Ortho et Traumal Turc, 2009: 43 (4): 298-302.
Becerro de Bengoa R, Losa E, Viejo F, et al. Cauterization of germinal nail matrix using phenol applications of differing durations: a histologic study. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2012; 67 (4): 706-711.
Brown AM, Kaplan LM, Brown ME. Phenol-induced histological skin changes: hazards, technique and uses. Br J Plast Surg, 1960; 13: 158-169.
Kominsky SJ, Daniels MD: A modified approach to the phenol and alcohol chemical partial matrixectomy. JAPMA, 2000; 90: 208.
Lam C, Billingsley M. Nasopharyngeal swab applicator for chemical matricectomy. Dermatol Surg, 2017; 0: 1-2.
Reyzelman A. Current concepts in performing matrixectomies. Podiatry Today, 2005; 18 (12): online disponible en www.podiatrytoday.com/article/4899 .
Becerro de Bengoa R, Losa ME, Sánchez R et al. Gauze application of phenol for matrixectomy. JAPMA, 2008; 98 (5): 418-421.
Tassara G, Araújo-Duarte M, Alberto-Machada M. Treatment of ingrown nail: comparison of recurrence rates between the nail matrix phenolizarion classical technique and phenolization associated with nail matrix curettage – is the association necessary?. An Bras Dermatol, 2011; 86 (5): 1046-8.
Greene AA. A modification of the phenol-alcohol technique for toenail correction. Curr Podiatry, 1964; 13: 20.
Hunter DM, Timerding BL, Leonard RB, et al. Effects of isopropyl alcohol, ethanol, and polyethylene glycol spirits in the treatment of acute phenol burns. Ann Emerg Med, 1992; 21: 1303.
Córdoba-Díaz D, Losa-Iglesias ME, Córdoba-Díaz M et al. Evidence of the efficacy of alcohol lavage in the phenolization treatment of ingrown toenails. JEADV, 2011; 25: 794-798.
Córdoba-Díaz D, Losa-Iglesias ME, Córdoba-Díaz M et al. Enhaced removal of phenol with saline solution over alcohol: an in vitro study. Dermatol Surg, 2012: 1-6.
Córdoba-Díaz D, Becerro de Bengoa R, Losa-Iglesias ME et al. Alcohol plus chlorhexidine is more efficient than alcohol alone for phenol- based chemical matricectomy: an in vitro study. Dermatol Surg, 2013; 39: 1363-1367.
Córdoba-Díaz D, Becerro de Bengoa R, Losa-Iglesias ME et al. Effectiveness of standar lavage with supplementar chlorhexidine in patients undergoing chemical matricectomy for ingrown toenails: A clinical trial. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2014; 70: 1092-1095.
Córdoba-Díaz D, Becerro de Bengoa R, Losa-Iglesias ME et al. Polihexanide solution is more efficient than alcohol to remove phenol in chemical matricectomy: an in vitro study. Dermatologic Therapy, 2014; 27: 369-372.
Ogalla-Rodríguez JM, Novel-Martí V, Giralt de Veciana E et al.
Matricectomías químicas. El Peu, 1998; 72: 421-3.
Álvarez-Jiménez J, Córdoba-Fernández A, Munuera PV. Effect of curettage after segmental phenolization in the treatment of onychocryptosis: A randomized double-blind clinical trial. Dermatol Surg, 2012; 38: 454-461.
Castillo-Sánchez LL. Estudio evolutivo sobre el periodo postquirúrgico en la técnica de Ogalla. El Peu, 2012; 34 (2): 30-37.Reyzelman A, Trombello K, Vayser D et al. Are antibiotics necessary in the treatment of locally infected ingrown toenails? Arch Fam Med, 2000: 9; 930.
Marcos-Tejedor F, Aldana-Caballero A, Mantínez-Nova A. Effect of phenol and sodium hydroxide in the bacterial load at nail fold after partial matricectomy. Dermatologic Surgery, 2017: 43 (2): 316-317.
Bos AMC, Van Tilburg MWA, Van Sorge AA et al. Randomized clinical trial of surgical technique and local antibiotics for ingrown toenail. British Journal of Surgery, 2007; 94: 292-296.
Dovison R, Keenan AM. Would healing and infection in nail matrix phenolization wounds. Does topical medication make a difference?. JAPMA, 2001; 91 (5): 230-233.
Van Gils CC, Roeder B, Chesler SM et al. Improved healing with a collagen-alginate dressing in the chemical matricectomy. JAPMA, 1998; 88(9): 452-456.